Welding glossary
Carbon equivalent (CE)
Carbon equivalent is a single index calculated from a steel's chemical composition that estimates its hardenability and susceptibility to hydrogen cracking under a given welding cooling rate.
- Unit
- % (weight percent, dimensionless)
- Formula
- CE(IIW) = C + Mn/6 + (Cr + Mo + V)/5 + (Ni + Cu)/15, all element contents in weight percent; Pcm and CET use different element sets and weightings for the same purpose
Carbon equivalent compresses a multi-element composition into one number that ranks how readily a steel forms hard, crack-susceptible martensite when it is welded and cooled. Carbon dominates hardenability, which is why it names the index, but manganese, chromium, molybdenum, vanadium, nickel and copper each contribute — some strongly, some only at the margin — and a single formula folds them together with weightings chosen to match how each element actually behaves under a welding thermal cycle rather than in slow furnace cooling.
There is no one carbon equivalent formula; there are several, built for different steel families and different failure mechanisms. CE(IIW), published by the International Institute of Welding, is the most widely quoted general-purpose version. Pcm (the Ito-Bessyo formula) weights carbon far more heavily and is the one generally preferred for the lower-carbon, higher-strength steels where CE(IIW) is a poor predictor. CET, defined directly in EN 1011-2, is the version that standard’s own preheat equation is built around. The three do not produce comparable numbers from the same composition, so a specification naming a maximum carbon equivalent has to name which formula the maximum applies to — a number without its formula attached is not verifiable.
The practical use of the index is as an input, not an output: it feeds directly into preheat temperature calculations, because a higher carbon equivalent means the joint needs to cool more slowly — a higher starting temperature — to avoid forming untempered martensite in the heat-affected zone. The same number also flags material where hydrogen cracking is a live risk, because susceptible microstructure is one of the three conditions that mechanism requires alongside hydrogen and tensile stress. A material certificate that omits an element the chosen formula needs — vanadium for CE(IIW), boron for Pcm — cannot be run through that formula honestly, and treating a missing element as zero understates the result for exactly the alloying choices that make hardenability worse.
Where you meet this term
- Mill certificate review, before a welding procedure is written for a new heat of material
- Preheat and interpass temperature calculations for hardenable carbon and low-alloy steels
- Hydrogen cracking risk assessment, read together with diffusible hydrogen content
- Weldability screening when qualifying a new steel grade, thickness or supplier