Railway rolling stock manufacturing
Railway weld monitoring for EN 15085 rolling stock
Thermal and process records for every weld on car bodies, underframes and bogies: what they show, how a one-cell pilot runs and what goes into the EN 15085 file.
ISO standard · reference card
Does ISO 9606-2 cover your aluminium welder, or does the steel part apply instead? Scope decision flow for the aluminium welder-qualification standard and the range-of-approval records a check depends on.
ISO 9606-2 is the aluminium-specific twin of the steel welder-qualification standard, and treating the two as interchangeable is the recurring mistake: a certificate under one part says nothing about the other, whatever the welder’s actual skill. Like its steel counterpart, it works through a range of approval a single test piece establishes, not a general license to weld the metal.
The variable that trips up range-of-approval checks specifically in aluminium work is alloy group. Aluminium alloys differ enough in weldability, filler compatibility and heat sensitivity that the standard’s own grouping table decides how far a certificate extends — and it does not extend as broadly as the equivalent steel groups often do.
Therness equipment does not administer or grade a qualification test. It ties every production aluminium weld to the welder who made it and the process values that weld ran at, so a range-of-approval and continuity check has a real record to test against. See ISO 9606-1 for the steel equivalent, and ISO 15614-2 for whether the aluminium procedure itself is qualified — a shop working aluminium commonly needs both.
| Question | If yes | If no |
|---|---|---|
| Is the parent material aluminium or an aluminium alloy, welded manually or partly mechanized? | ISO 9606-2 is the applicable welder-qualification standard. | Steel routes to ISO 9606-1; copper, nickel or titanium route to the matching part (ISO 9606-3, -4, -5); mechanized aluminium welding routes to ISO 14732. |
| Does the job fall inside the test piece's range of approval — alloy group, thickness, diameter, position? | The existing certificate covers the work. | A new qualification test, or an allowed extension, is needed before assignment. |
| Does the job's alloy group differ from the alloy group the test piece used? | Check the standard's own grouping table — aluminium groups do not extend as broadly as steel groups often do. | The certificate's alloy scope covers the job. |
Conformity is decided by inspection and testing against the criteria the standard and the contract set. The records below are evidence that the process was held where it was qualified; they support an inspection result, they never replace one.
| Requirement | Record produced | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Proof a production aluminium weld sat inside the welder's current range of approval | Welder ID joined to each weld record alongside the measured process values | WeldTrace |
| A continuity trail an auditor can check against the standard's confirmation interval | Per-weld timestamp and process record exported per welder over time | HeatCore AI |
No. Each base-metal family has its own part of the series — copper is ISO 9606-3, nickel ISO 9606-4, titanium and zirconium ISO 9606-5. An aluminium certificate does not extend across the family boundary.
Aluminium's weldability, filler compatibility and heat sensitivity differ enough from steel that a single grouping table could not serve both without either over- or under-qualifying welders, so the series splits by base metal instead.
No. The two parts run separate grouping and extension logic; a steel qualification's breadth says nothing about how far an aluminium test piece extends under ISO 9606-2's own table.
Therness records what the machine actually delivered on every weld — parameters, thermal signature and a per-weld trail — so a conformity argument rests on measurements instead of recollection.